this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
167 points (98.8% liked)

UK Politics

3091 readers
131 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

For some?! It's literally everyone, the CGT bands are 10% and 20%, for non-property

https://www.gov.uk/capital-gains-tax/rates

Equalisation of CGT and Income tax is a no brainer. The argument has always been that CGT (and things like entrepreneur relief) should exist because of the risks involved, but given that both allow offsetting against costs and losses (and income tax doesn't) it's always been a bullshit argument which exists purely to preserve wealth.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's "for some" because if you're willing to earn an unliveable pittance, you aren't taxed very much if anything.

In principle though, you are right.