this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
274 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

9549 readers
984 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Election Interference / Misinformation

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world -5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I think Canada's gun control laws would be one of the biggest factors preventing Alaska joining. Many people depend on their guns there for hunting, defense against wildlife for themselves or their animals, and for self defense. Many people live remotely where police response times may not be fast enough to respond to a violent situation.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

We have guns in Canada. I went hunting with my dad, there is a certain distance from the city you need to be for firing a gun. Those in more remote areas of Canada have guns for all the things you stated. My neighbour in our city, has about 8 guns; hand guns, long guns. People think Canada doesn't have guns because we don't flaunt them as our lifestyle.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

As though Canada doesn't have anything as remote as Alaska... People living in Labrador or Churchill have exactly the same needs.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And many of those people hate Canada's gun laws. The guy i work with from kapuskasing would gladly have Canada become the 51st state if it meant he could have more guns.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So? It demonstrates that, contrary to your assertion that people depend on American gun laws, it is perfectly possible to exist in these situations with Canada's gun laws. I get that people have an emotional dependency on guns, but that's not an actual necessity.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All I claimed was that alaskans would have a hard time giving up their guns to join Canada. I never claimed it was impossible to live rurally without a gun.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why would they have to give up guns, we have guns in Canada

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Canada had significantly different gun laws and most of their current guns or accessories may be illegal depending on magazine capacity, barrel length, or specific model.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Fair, but that's an easy fix. Like a shotgun holds 5 shells but in Canada you can only have 3 in it, so you load a plug. Change your magazine. Etc. Doesn't mean you give up everything, and on the flip side you get healthcare