this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
648 points (96.3% liked)

World News

46045 readers
3881 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With surveys reporting that an increasing number of young men are subscribing to these beliefs, the number of women finding that their partners share the misogynistic views espoused by the likes of Andrew Tate is also on the rise. Research from anti-fascism organisation Hope Not Hate, which polled about 2,000 people across the UK aged 16 to 24, discovered that 41% of young men support Tate versus just 12% of young women.

“Numbers are growing, with wives worried about their husbands and partners becoming radicalised,” says Nigel Bromage, a reformed neo-Nazi who is now the director of Exit Hate Trust, a charity that helps people who want to leave the far right.

“Wives or partners become really worried about the impact on their family, especially those with young children, as they fear they will be influenced by extremism and racism.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rimu@piefed.social 204 points 3 days ago (4 children)

"Do you regularly watch videos by Jordan Peterson?" kinda needs to become one of those before-first-date screening questions.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

either that or: ben shapiro, or joe roegan videos.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Weirdly, I know of more women who listen to joe rogan than men (okay, the numbers are 2 to 0, so not that mindblowing). I don't fucking get it.

It was the same thing with friends who liked Elon Musk before he went fully mask off after buying Twitter. Who he was, and the function he provided, was so completely obvious to anyone who was paying attention. I don't get how anyone could miss it.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People missed it because they chose to "not pay attention to politics", leading to right wing indoctrination.

Turns out everything is political.

[–] Necroscope0@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Does UFC count as watching Joe Rogan videos even if his commentary annoys the shit out of you and you wish he had no part in it? Because he already pisses me off this would be the last straw.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I groan every time they announce he's on the commentary team. It's clear he doesn't actively watch the sport anymore, and he simply can't avoid hyperbole.

[–] Necroscope0@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Seriously, I have learned to ignore him so well that last time he was not on the team it took me half the fight to realize "Where is that annoying fucking Rogan has he really not said shit this whole fii... oooohhh sweet. lol

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

What if the answer is yes, but I'm laughing at him the whole time?

Editing this dumb two day old throwaway comment to point out if you want to actually overcome the rhetoric you disagree with, then you need to pay enough attention to it to actually interact with people who take it seriously, because apparently I'm still getting replies.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Views = money/support for them. Doesn't matter if you're laughing or not.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 58 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Still shows that you've got a whole lot of time to waste and that you might be susceptible to eventually fall down the rabbit hole

[–] Sineljora@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you have right attitude. No one is immune to propaganda, and you really need to be careful in choosing what you consume.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I've been deep diving into right wing propaganda for a decade and still not an incel. Still laughing at the fools and their weak beta energy.

Being able to speak their language is far more impactful. Not for the right wing tool spreading propaganda but rather for the lurker who has doubts.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ah yes, ridicule famously being a small step from endorsement.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can ridicule it all you want, if you keep watching it you're one message you agree with away from starting to consider that "hey, maybe what he's saying isn't all wrong" and then down the spiral you go.

https://youtu.be/P55t6eryY3g

There's tons of people who were on the left that lived an event that traumatized them and they then turned to the right.

Alt-Right playbook needs to be required reading for everyone online.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I think the main problem is "regularly watch"

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

What's about him is in the least bit funny or entertaining?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's also bad. You regularly hate-watch him? Don't you have anything better to do with your time?

It should only take you about 15 minutes of watching him to understand his gimmick. He used undefined and undefinable terms like "cultural marxism". He cherry picks out of context sciencey stuff to back up his point of view. He acts super serial all the time to make people think he's a serious person. That's it. You don't need to watch any more.

[–] suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t you have anything better to do with your time?

As opposed to replying a two day old throwaway comment?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

That took seconds, listening to everything Jordan Peterson puts out takes hours and hours.

[–] BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Very direct. They could lie about it. Better to ask conceptually I think.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

"What can you tell me about jungian archetypes?"

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ask about Lex Fridman: at least for tech geeks it is the antichamber to Joe Rogan and the pandemonium thereafter.

[–] BillyTheKid@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok. Tell me about Lex Fridman. I've never read that name before.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe him to be of Russian descent, and playing hard on the American stereotype of that.

He has had a troubled academic career due to a faulty paper trying to prove Tesla's Autopilot to make people more attentive.

He has a long standing podcast in which he interviews mostly techbros and politicians such as Musk, Carmack, Trump, Modi and the like for hours at a time. He never really challenges them and lets them speak on whatever they bring up, turning his podcasts into hours-long PR stunts.

Probably a Russian asset, given that in this comment to his conversation with Zelensky he reiterated Trump/Vance talking points.

I have noticed that people who later reveal themselves to be into Joe Rogan and the like first test the waters by asking you if you listened to the latest Fridman podcast. I work in a tech consultancy so I have quite a sample, but it could also be a bubble.

Andrew Rousso made a spot on imitation of the guy here, as usual. It's worth listening to a Lex Fridman podcast intro just to enjoy Rousso's imitation.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hol'up is Carmack a manosphere weirdo?

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Not really into the manosphere I think, but he is definitely a tech solutionist.

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'd also like to know. Carmack, unlike most tech bros, is actually intelligent. I wouldn't have taken him to be a Nazi, especially since one of the games that made him rich was about killing Nazis.

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I don't think he is a Nazi, but if you think that is what would save you from being a Nazi, you haven't been following the last 80 years of developments in Palestine.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You needs to screen your partners SoMe algorithm