this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
808 points (98.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21210 readers
96 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     

    I save this meme a while ago, I think it is from Reddit

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 62 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I've played before anticheat was a thing and it is meaningless. Cheaters are going to cheat. The best anticheat systems are voting. The game kicks a winning vote total and then that server sends the rest of the servers it's results. Then that account is flagged as a cheater. The only way a cheater can exist is they hide and don't cheat and are obvious in it

    [–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Votekick really doesn’t work as an anticheat, especially without good playback analysis option and even then good gamesense looks like wallhacking in shooters to new players for example when all you are doing is tracking sound and have good crosshair placement. If you can’t review replay and there is no blatant cheating like speedhack or spinbot or teleporting, what are you voting on? The fact that you are getting stomped?

    To be clear I’m not saying invasive anti-cheat is the way, but IMO voting is not the way to go.

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Votekick is enough to stop cheater from cheating in current match.

    [–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    The point is what are you basing the cheating report on? Is it blatant? Because rarely is it blatant especially if you can’t review playback.

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    And how playback would help to remove cheaters in real time?

    [–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    On what basis are you votekicking then?

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] DrRatso@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    So essentially votekick people that are simply better than you 9/10 times.

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

    Yes, when they have better spinbot than me /s

    [–] uis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

    Never Trust User Input!