this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
579 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

59270 readers
3772 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tesla knew Autopilot caused death, but didn't fix it::Software's alleged inability to handle cross traffic central to court battle after two road deaths

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're not buying a plane though. They're buying a car with an autopilot that is labeled as "full self driving". That term does imply it will handle a complete route from A to B.

People are wrongly buying into the marketing hype and that is causing crashes.

I'm very concerned about some of the things I've seen regarding FSD on Teslas. Such as sudden hard braking on highways, failing to avoid an accident (but it's OK it disengaged seconds before impact so the human was in control) and of course the viral video of FSD trying to kill a cyclist.

They should not be allowed to market the feature this way and I don't think it should be openly available to normal users as it is now. It's just too dangerous to put in the hands (or not) of normal drivers.

[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Autopilot has never been "Full Self Driving". FSD is an additional $15,000 package on top of the car. Autopilot is the free system providing lane keeping with adaptive cruise, same as "Pro Pilot Assist" or "Honda Sensing" or any of the other packages from other car companies. The only difference is whenever someone gets in an accident using any of those technologies we never get headlines about it.

[–] anlumo@feddit.de -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've never sat in a Tesla, so I'm not really sure, but based on the things I've read online, autopilot and FSD are two different systems on Tesla cars you can engage separately. There shouldn't be any confusion about this.

[–] Miqo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've never sat in a Tesla, so I'm not really sure

There shouldn't be any confusion about this.

U wot m8?

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

There's three tiers. Autopilot, Enhanced Autopilot and FSD Beta

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, if it's just the lane assistance autopilot that is causing this kind of crash. I'd agree it's likely user error. The reason I say if, is because I don't trust journalists to know or report on the difference.

I am still concerned the FSD beta is "out there" though. I do not trust normal users to understand what beta means, and of course no-one is going to read the agreement before clicking agree. They just want to see their car drive itself.

[–] anlumo@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

If it were about the FSD implementation, things would be very different. I'm pretty sure that the FSD is designed to handle cross traffic, though.

I do not trust normal users to understand what beta means

Yeah, Google kinda destroyed that word in the public conciousness when they had their search with the beta flag for more than a decade while growing to be one of the biggest companies on Earth with it.

When I first heard about it, I was very surprised that the US even allows vehicles with beta self-driving software on public roads. That's like testing a new fire fighter truck by randomly setting buildings on fire in a city and then trying to stop that with the truck.

[–] Ocelot@lemmies.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I don't trust a machine that has been trained for millions of hours and simulated every possible traffic scenario tens of millions of times and has millisecond reaction time while seeing the world in a full 360 degrees. A system that never drives drunk, distracted or fatigued. You know who's really good at driving though? Humans. Perfect track record, those humans.