Does the third person argue that it is easy or does the third person only argue that it is easier than the alternatives? How easy would it be to run a revolution or just to establish a socialist party?

What is the third person missing about the reserve army of labor? To me, it seems that reducing the reserve army of labor is their main argument.

What the third person doesn't mention is that there is a tendency to spend all possible income. The housing market shows that most people use reduced interest rates to increase their offer to outcompete somebody instead of sticking to their limits.

Are skilled workers willing to share their increased income with the poor? San Francisco has huge social problems even though many workers have a huge income.