this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
504 points (96.5% liked)

Linux

7114 readers
509 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

::: spoiler References

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8uurg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Also, the user experience is also bound to be much better when a manufacturer provides a tested and supported operating system, especially for "non-experts" for whom a terminal is an arcane inscription tablet.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ha!

Have you seen the bloatware they ship with Windows? It somehow manages to be so much worse than base windows… it’s honestly much better if they don’t touch the OS at all, barring the absolute bare minimum of making sure input works.

I’m being cynical: I know some OEMs do make kernel contributions and such. Still, the “generic” support distros/chip makers provide for free is better, given their track record.