this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
506 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

14937 readers
1855 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I didn't actually know this (all my math knowledge comes from what my cs degree forced me to ingest) but google says yes (since natural numbers, being a countably infinite set, are apparently an example of the smallest possible cardinality of infinite sets, so any infinite subset of natural numbers is always the same cardinality.)

The answets to this stackexchange question go into detail but that's beyond what I understand without a lot of effort tbh.

[โ€“] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 month ago

OK, that makes some degree of sense in the abstract. I'll try to hold on to it.

Thanks for checking and getting back to me. It helps grok the cardinality a bit more.