this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2482 readers
761 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
PugJesus@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
5
There's no way this could go wrong (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 weeks ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/historymemes@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm fine with an armed population, as long as people that might harm themselves or do mass shootings cant get weapons.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"people who do mass shootings can't get weapons" just means "everybody gets to do one mass shooting but no more"

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or just implement a process to check the mental health of people who want to get guns, and if theyre insane and are at risk of doing that, then they dont get the guns

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I reread your comment and I think I parsed it differently than the way you intended it.

what you said:

people that might harm themselves or do mass shootings

what you certainly must have meant by it:

people who might:

  • harm themselves
  • do mass shootings

the way I read it:

people who:

  • might harm themselves
  • do mass shootings

so there's where my comment comes from.