this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1075 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

69699 readers
3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 67 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Who the fuck comes up with this stuff?

[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 8 points 8 hours ago

This is the sort of thing machine learning algorithms are pretty good at at.

Coupled with however many millions of interactions a day, you would have no problem correlating changes to your algorithm against increases in revenue.

But. It’s often not that impressive. Humans are equally good at noticing patterns.

All it takes is for one person at FB to see their wife or daughter delete a post, ask them “why did you delete that post” and take away from the response of “It made me look fat” to go “there’s a new targeted ad that’ll get me a bonus”.

In a similar vein, 80% of your banks anti-fraud systems isn’t deep learning models that detect fraudulent behaviour. Instead it’s “if the user is based in Russia, add 80 points, and if the account is at a branch in 10km of Heinersdorf Berlin, add another 50…. We’re pretty sure a Russian scammer goes on holiday every 6 months and opens a bunch of accounts there, we just don’t know which ones”.

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The most generous assumption is that they use statistics to determine correlations like this (e.g., deleted selfies resulted in a high CTR for beauty ads so they made that a part of their algo). The least generous interpretation is exactly what you're thinking: an asshole came up with it because it's logical and effective.

Either way, ethics needs to be a bigger part of the programmers education. And we, as a society, need to make algorithms more transparent (at least social media algorithms). Reddit's trending algorithm used to be open source during the good ole days.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Can you make the algorithm open source that determined it was ok for you to murder Tuvix tho

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 13 hours ago
if (ugly) {
    kill_child(child_name);
} else {
    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
}
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

JANEWAY DID WHAT SHE HAD TO DO

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

People who traded morals for money.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

The kind of person whose past probably includes more than a few vivisected animals.