this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
670 points (98.3% liked)
Curated Tumblr
5000 readers
26 users here now
For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.
The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:
-
FOSS Android Recs per u/m_f@discuss.online: 1 , 2
Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lol I'm not taking it literally, I'm taking it analytically. It's entirely valid to dissect a metaphor and analyze what it means and why. An allegory is itself an argument - a way of using fictional elements to deliver non-fictional ideas. It's normal to argue for or against the allegory as being a useful delivery system for those ideas.
If it's not a good metaphor.. well, that's exactly what the rest of us are talking about when we critique the Rogue/Storm thing. You are the only one in the room that doesn't understand that we are all calling that a bad metaphor.
We know the forest is there, we just think there's a big stupid tree that is actually blocking our view.
Edit - and for the record, I'm not critiquing the entire forest! The rest of the metaphor is pretty good. But those examples really do undercut their own delivery of the idea.
Storm's comment was directed at Rogue. The one who was excited about a cure for her horrible condition that makes it so she can't touch another human being without fucking them up. If literally anyone else had asked if it was true there was a cure then your point would make sense but Rogue actually does need the cure. It was shitty writing to have it be Rouge that got that lecture and people are right to call it out.