this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
1161 points (93.4% liked)

memes

14637 readers
3738 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If you are subverting the means or process of exploitation against itself, well, that's pretty subversive, anarchist, punk.

Wouldnt the same thing be able to be said about writing "Elon Musk is bad" on twitter?

[โ€“] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I mean, when Elon bought Twitter, I, having never used Twitter before, created an account just to scream at him, and I managed to get banned in a few hours.

But to attempt to answer your question: Arguably, technically, yes, but it really only matters if it significantly fucks with Elon, or inspires other to meaningfully resist him, or aide those he oppresses.

One person doing that?

Flash in the pan.

Coordinated , consistent swarm, of people or bots, doing this untill the entire site goes down?

Even better: hack in their and reroute it to fucking DDoS itself?

Maybe a bit more meaningful.

I find the use of AIGen to essentially advocate against itself to be fairly clever.

Its not like you have to burn down a bushel of wheat's cropland every time you copy and paste an already generated image.