this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
48 points (100.0% liked)

Theory Discussion Group

27 readers
3 users here now

Moved from /c/genzedong since the rules are a bit different.

This community is meant to educate, and people from any instances federated with Lemmygrad are welcome.

Rules:

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

You can read the text on ProleWiki.

You can post questions or share your thoughts at any time. When we move on to a new text, this thread won't be locked.

^Previous\ thread^

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Comrade_Improving@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What is contained in Lenin's method was in the main already contained in the teachings of Marx, which, according to Marx himself, were "in essence critical and revolutionary."(...) As a matter of fact, Lenin's method is not only the restoration of, but also the concretisation and further development of the critical and revolutionary method of Marx, of his materialist dialectics.

Some think that Leninism is the precedence of practice over theory in the sense that its main point is the translation of the Marxist theses into deeds, their "execution"; as for theory; it is alleged that Leninism is rather unconcerned about it.

I must declare that this more than odd opinion about Lenin and Leninism is quite wrong and bears no relation whatever to the truth; that the attempt of practical workers to brush theory aside runs counter to the whole spirit of Leninism and is fraught with serious dangers to the work.

Theory is the experience of the working-class movement in all countries taken in its general aspect. Of course, theory becomes purposeless if it is not connected with revolutionary practice, just as practice gropes in the dark if its path is not illumined by revolutionary theory. But theory can become a tremendous force in the working-class movement if it is built up in indissoluble connection with revolutionary practice;

I must add to this that saying that Marx only cared about theory is such an absurd lie that only revisionists could come up with it, the man was exiled from multiple countries and persecuted until his last days because of his definitely practical participation in proletarian movements.

[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Marx understood the actions required by the material conditions of his place and time were primarily agitation and propaganda. Too many people think praxis means reading a chapter of theory for every bomb you plant. Material conditions are the fulcrum on which the balance of theory and action plays out. We don't all get to be Che Guevara.

[–] cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 days ago

Of course, theory becomes purposeless if it is not connected with revolutionary practice, just as practice gropes in the dark if its path is not illumined by revolutionary theory.

Lenin and Mao agree with Stalin:

"Without revolutionary theory, there can be no revolutionary movement, " —Lenin

"No political party can possibly lead a great revolutionary movement to victory unless it possesses revolutionary theory and a knowledge of history and has a profound grasp of the practical movement." —Mao

And:

"If we have a correct theory but merely prate about it, pigeonhole it and do not put it into practice, then that theory, however good, is of no significance." —Mao