this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
784 points (95.8% liked)

Fediverse

17717 readers
5 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is probably due to a number of people stopping using their alts after some instance hopping.

Also a few people who came to see how it was, and weren't attracted enough to become regular visitors.

Curious to see at which number we'll stabilize.

Next peak will probably happen after either major features release (e.g. exhaustive mod tools allowing reluctant communities to move from Reddit) or the next Reddit fuck up (e.g. removing old.reddit)

Stats on each server: https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] buzziebee@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the default activity sort is part of the problem. Sorting by activity means everyone is just looking at and engaging with the same topics for 24 hours or so. There needs to be some "hot" category or something so that new stuff gets churned through a bit more regularly. New is too new, top is even more stale, activity causes things with high activity to stay high. It makes for very samey content.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] sure@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my experience, Active and Hot have been opposite extremes of freshness. Active shows posts that are more than a day old, and Hot shows posts that have no comments and are just a couple of minutes old.

Not to say it's all bad. Your post was just a couple of scrolls down on my feed.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I vote for sorting by new comments... I'm generally entertained with this setup

[–] Death2lois@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have they finally fixed this to not show old posts out of nowhere in the "Hot" feed? I've been avoiding this sorting because of that and hadn't read anything about it being corrected... yet.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't remember if it was fixed in 18.3 or 18.4, but it has been for a while.

Worth giving it a try, even if your instance is still 18.3

[–] Death2lois@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

Ooo! I will, thanks!