this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
579 points (97.7% liked)

science

18668 readers
58 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip
579
Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.world
108 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Science has been canceled until 2028

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Found the American.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

True, but also want to emphasize that this has worldwide implications, the NIH is a major contributor to clinical research. Probably more harmful if it produces garbage data than less data