this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
580 points (97.7% liked)

science

18668 readers
37 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
m3t00@lemmy.world
Joleee@lemmy.world
laverabe@lemmy.world
DeadPand@midwest.social
laverabe@lemmy.zip
580
Is red meat bad for health? Meta-study of 44 studies finds results depend on the sponsor. If the sponsor is impartial, studies find it's bad. Studies sponsored by the meat industry find the opposite (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.world
108 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] DonPiano@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cool, can you show how big the effect is, based on your team's efforts? And what the distribution of values is, based on sponsor?

[โ€“] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

It's bell curves all the way down, anything else is proprietary knowledge.