this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
64 points (95.7% liked)

Selfhosted

46676 readers
295 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just learned that POCKET will shut down in July 2025. It is a great service to collect articles on various devices and read later on a tablet & offline.

Which alternatives are out there?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love my LinkWarden instance. I haven't found it lacking for my needs, despite over 3000 links thus far

[–] jacksquat@what.forfi.win 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I've mostly loved it too but I'd really like to have something that had lower RAM usage. I only have a few hundred entries and right now my container stack is using ~620Mb. Just seems rather high for what it's doing/does. Are you finding the same kind of usage?

[–] HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

That's definitely fair. I'll admit its not the lightest on ram but it hasn't gone crazy on me yet. With that said, I'm running if on a home lab k3s, and haven't remotely flirted with running out of ram

I'm also using the hell out of it all the time, so I don't mind it using what needs right now.

FWIW, with 3000 links, my container users 787 MB of ram. I don't think that's crazy considering what it's doing during the archiving process

[–] jacksquat@what.forfi.win 1 points 4 hours ago

That makes more sense with that many links. Thanks for the response.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I've just started using linkwarden and love it as well. I chose it over Karakeep because it archives a copy of the page so it's still accessible if the original page is modified or becomes inaccessible in the future.