this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
1015 points (97.4% liked)

Progressive Politics

2632 readers
548 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

not the views we don't like, but the ones that cause harm and suffering for western societies.

[–] the_three_tomatoes@lemmy.world -4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

And where do we draw that line? And why only Western?

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

And where do we draw that line? And why only Western?

as i said to the previous poster, "i believe neuroscience has the ability to quantify suffering."

i speak of western cultures because we are so obsessed with individual liberty that we will be the hardest to convince that some censorship in the interest of promoting a healthy society is possible and needed.

And where do we draw that line? And why only Western?

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee -4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

“Ones that cause harm and suffering” is subjective though.

Blocking online content, even ones we don’t like, is a slippery slope

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago

i believe it can be objective. i believe neuroscience has the ability to quantify suffering. i believe if we spent more time studying neuroscience and the health of a society, this could all be feasible.

i agree that censorship of things we 'don't like' is not a society i want to live in. i just think that there are objective answers to what now seems like vague questions.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -2 points 4 hours ago

As in all conservative opinions.