this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
197 points (98.0% liked)

News

29506 readers
1982 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AfroMustache@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Can somebody sum up the benefits of a city run grocery store? I'm not trying to be combative it's just an unfamiliar concept for me and I am curious.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

No profit motive. Better pay and benefits for workers. City pension.

[–] AfroMustache@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

That makes sense. Two questions though:

  1. If the store is unprofitable where would the money come from?
  2. If the store is profitable, would the money be reinvested in the store or taken for other projects/services by the city?

I would say one of the main benefits would probably be the better access in less profitable areas that the other commenter mentioned.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I don’t think profit works like we think it does… if king soopers, or farm fresh or some other giant grocery store does not make more and more sales every year, they consider this unprofitable even if the store is making money…

Profits are excess money that go back to the executives and shareholders…

With no shareholders all of that money goes or would go back to the community.

A city run grocery store could prioritize locally grown produce and local meat for example, and since they aren’t worried about constantly making more and more money in the short term, i assume it could boost the local economy in the exact opposite way that large corporate chains leech money out of communities. The better pay and benefits that city workers make alone would contribute to that.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago
  1. Run as a public service without the motivation of profit, the funding would come from the city or state taxing residents.

  2. More than likely, if the service does turn a profit, it would likely be split between the service ans a slush fund for the city. This can be a negative though, as it is likely the city given budget would be cut since profits would make up the gap.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

And with no profit motive, you can have better access in less profitable neighborhoods.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The giant corporations leech as much value out of the system as they possibly can, a city running the grocery stores for example, could easily donate expired or close to expired products to homeless shelters or other local food banks etc…

Many of the larger chains literally destroy tons of edible food products every year if not every week because by giving it away they are ‘losing money’