Asklemmy

48175 readers

844 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

172

What hills are you dying on? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 day ago by SpaceFox@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

328 comments fedilink hide all child comments

. The race of a voice actor doesn't matter

. It is possible to wear yoga pants because there comfy

. You don't need to shower everyday

. It is possible to crossdress/be gender non-conforming without being trans

. Monty Python is very overrated

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rabber@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Rather than banning that just tax the shit out of people who have multiple homes

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The Welsh did that (or just some Welsh councils?), pretty sure it was very popular among the people actually living in the area.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 hours ago

I'd even be willing to let someone have their lake/hunting cabin/whatever and not tax too much but people are greedy and we're far past that point. Once you start accumulating 5-10 homes, taking them off the market for other buyers, the taxes should increase exponentially.