this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
846 points (98.5% liked)
Greentext
6313 readers
1580 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"the ones I spied for weeks"
Words hard, apparently.
"only reason the doom is not doomed"
he am good word man
I can empathize.
I'm a native speaker and sometimes even my words refuse to English right.
Genuine question from a non native English speaker here: what's wrong?
We would usually say "the ones I spied on". English is the only language I've ever spoken and although it sounds weird to not include the word "on", I really dont see why its necessary either.
Because "spied for," and "spied with" are both options.
"I spied them" is a legitimate sentence, but it doesn't mean covert surveillance in that sentence, only to have seen then, generally through some difficulty.
They left out the word "on" and the best that m137 has to contribute to the conversation is someone did a typo.
It's supposed to be "the ones I spied on for weeks".
The ones on whom I spied for weeks. 😂
I think that's just how British brain rot wording works. They all talk this way. Read some of their news paper headlines.
unlike those American headlines
Those last two are definitely intentional.
It wasn't an American who wrote "Foot Heads Arms Body."
yes but that is an incredible and brilliant piece of writing, one I'd argue outstrips Baby Shoes Never Worn