this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
196 points (89.2% liked)

Asklemmy

48229 readers
343 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

. The race of a voice actor doesn't matter

. It is possible to wear yoga pants because there comfy

. You don't need to shower everyday

. It is possible to crossdress/be gender non-conforming without being trans

. Monty Python is very overrated

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] nsrxn@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if I died today there is no reason for me to believe any industry would get smaller as a result, and I would of course stop purchasing everything.

there are more vegans now more than ever, and more meat produced. being vegan doesn't decrease the size of the industry.

[โ€“] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Obviously not. Eating meat increases the size of the meat industry. If twice as many people ate meat, that'd be twice as good for the meat industry -- I think. At least some constant factor times better. I would have to double-check my old textbook to see what classical economics predicts, there might be diminishing returns.

[โ€“] nsrxn@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

eating meat doesn't cause people in the meat industry to do anything. they get to choose what they do.

[โ€“] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Are you just trolling at this point? Do you even understand what you're saying about causality? Are we debating semantics?

Edit: this is like saying you have zero ethical qualms with somebody hiring an assassin to kill somebody. Yeah, the assassin ultimately does the deed, but you're still paying for it. If you had not hired the assassin, the person would not have died -- looks like cause and effect to me.

Similarly, you should understand that if you choose to eat meat, that benefits the meat industry and more animals will die as a result. Put aside your definition of "cause" for a moment -- you must agree with me that this is true right?

[โ€“] Applejuicy@feddit.nl 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I pity that you spent this long talking to a very poor LLM set out to troll people. Either that, or a human so far gone there's truly no point in talking to them, as they deluded themselves into believing that the world is completely seperated from their actions.

[โ€“] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I think I learned a little from this interaction. But it was more cathartic than I would have thought to be honest. That was two accounts btw.