News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Ok, but let’s not be divisive among generations over a common enemy.
No war but class war.
Exactly. As a millenial, my goal is to be compassionate for the next generation — not to pull the "when I was your age" card on Gen Z and Alpha.
Yup! I'm a millenial here and I'm not here to compete for the oppression Olympics.
The rich just gave themselves another tax break. I'm not here to fight my fellow people. I want to eat the rich!
I hold nothing but compassion and solidarity for those who follow.
I want things to be easier for them, not as hard or harder than they were for us.
Story:
Just had a really painful conversation with my Boomer in-laws. They refuse to see acknowledge how bad things are for us and blame us for our failure to thrive like they got to, after receiving a six-figure cash injection back in the 80s from their parents, which is all gone now with their frivolous spending.
In the US, 1950-1980 is the era of lowest wealth inequality in the countries history. The top tax rate reached 91% in that time period. It is currently around 37%. Us poors had it worse before then, and have it worse after then. They won a birth lottery. Source: Thomas Piketty's 'Capital in the 21st Century'
Cutting the top tax rate in 1983 actually increased tax revenue. A 91% rate is too high and encourages tax avoidance and evasion
And now that it’s lower the billionaires are happy to pay their fair share and society is better off for it. /s
They have reduced it since then never recreating the same results which is likelya larger factor
yrdf
Do you have a source for that? I found this source that is citing data from the congressional budget office. SOURCE (I followed the link and did confirm the numbers match). I made a quick plot so it was easier to see trends. Nothing stands out to me about 1983 - there's a small dip and then a course correction back towards the upwards trajectory, but this data tells us nothin about wealth inequality. We can't use total values because of inflation and such , probably have to use revenue as a %GDP or something but I'm too lazy too keep searching at the moment :) My immediate thought looking at the plot is this: If the total tax rev kept going up, and the top tax rate was cut, then the increased tax burden must have shifted to the poorer classes; I'd have to verify but it seems like a logical conclusion.
Yeah, your graph is a good source. Tax revenue growth steadily increases starting at 1983
PEW abandoned generational studies because they aren’t useful. You have more in common with people your age +/- 5 years than you have with your generation
It's because discrete generations aren't a real thing.
You summed it up best: same age give or take a few years. I'm an elder millennial and have more in common with the youngest gen X than with the youngest millennials.
I mean if gen Z men are a big fascist majority, when does it start being a class war?
Doesn't matter, no war but class war.
The primary adjective/insult to focus on is them being a fascist; the moment you pull any other, non-related adjective into the insult, they give themselves permission to ignore you.
Fuck fascist assholes, fuck the upper class, no matter the demographic.