this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
405 points (97.4% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

3110 readers
531 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Florida and Utah have already removed fluoridation from public water systems. What if the rest of the country follows?

The long-term effects of banning fluoride from public drinking water across the country could cost families billions of dollars and result in millions of rotten teeth, a new analysis predicts. 

The study, published Friday in JAMA Health Forum, shows that if all 50 states stopped community water fluoridation programs, kids in the U.S. could expect to develop 25.4 million more cavities within the next five years. 

That’s the equivalent of a decayed tooth in 1 out of every 3 children.

The number of cavities would more than double in 10 years, to 53.8 million.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lud@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean it is banned in Sweden (and so is every manipulation of the drinking water) and we are doing alright. I don't really care whenever you guys ban it or not, but the world won't end if you ban it.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Don't you have affordable dental care and time off from work? Not exactly apples and apelsiner.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

Sweden also has significantly more robust social safety nets, higher income, homogenous population among many other things that allow this to work out. The US has entire regions where dental care basically isn’t a thing and I don’t think it’s ok to be harming our already very vulnerable populations and leaving kids with painful, expensive dental issues that could have been prevented that can contribute to things like poor eating, malnutrition, blood infections, distracting pain and discomfort

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

it's a weird issue to me, because it's a really out-dated conspiracy theory.

most people these days have been marketed away from tap water and only drink bottled stuff, which doesn't fluoridate its water. and the people that are too poor to drink the bottled stuff probably have more to worry about when it comes to the pipes carrying the water.

fluoridation was started a long time ago, before a lot of people brushed their teeth with toothpaste. which is the next funny thing to me. why do we still need fluoride in water if people use toothpaste now, and why are people opposed to having it in their water when they consume it voluntarily multiple times every day?

you want to address water issues in america? start with fucking michigan. start with the lead pipes in low income areas. address the science that shows a link between lead poisoning and crime.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See, those last points sound good, but that doesn’t make any money for Republicans.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

ironic, really, given how big those elephant tusks are. but then again, they don't embody the elephant any more. if anything, don junior taught us they just kill them for fun now