this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
590 points (98.7% liked)

Reddit

20694 readers
233 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 105 points 4 days ago (8 children)

I don't remember who said it, but I think about this comment a lot:

All these billionaires would rather spend their wealth building bunkers for when their actions cause social collapse, instead of trying to prevent social collapse in the first place.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The thing is, none of these bunkers are built by billionaires. Would be real unfortunate if they had some design flaws in them lol

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

Many Bothans have died to bring us this intel.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Probably won't protect them from things like direct conventional bombardment of bombs or even bunker busters. Or even a nuke

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't need to be any design flaws, a few minutes with a welder and/or a truck load of concrete at the door once they're in there would render the whole billionaire problem "solved", Hotel California style.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Given we're talking about the total collapse of society, the goal in such an event would be less "keep the billionaire in" and more "get all the food and ammunition he's hoarding out. And any women."

[–] RedPostItNote@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

The women will likely just open the door for you to get away from the creepy weirdos inside

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago

These assholes always fantasize that their wealth and accumulation of luxury items will grant them the leg up to become rulers during the social collapse. They don't realize that in case of a social collapse the world won't immediately look like Mad Max, and they certainly aren't Immortan Joe. It will look more like Children of Man. Very slow and very gradual and with a lot mass governmental violence, not small arms violence.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 13 points 4 days ago

Because becoming a billionaire itself contributes to society’s collapse. They are opposite goals.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Further, they don't have what it takes to survive off the land, nor the intimidation to warlord after.

Other than a pensioners its difficult to imagine someone more dependant on the systems.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

No wilderness survival skills, how do they know which berries to eat and which will poison you, or which animal carcass have a ton of parasites you should never eat, never eat a carnivore or an animal that eats mostly carrion.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't think they necessarily "prefer" it. It's more just that they have what is an unimaginable amount of money in comparison to us, why not invest to preserve your long term survival?

They have already dealt with the normal shit the rest of us have to. They have a house, car, enough money for them and their families to never work again, to do whatever hobbies they like with no restriction.

If you are someone with a worth of a billion, this bunker development will cost something like 10m. That's 1% of your wealth. It would be the same as the median American spending $1920 in pure relative terms, but probably would have an effect more like $500 on their real finances (again, every other need has been financially met long, long ago)

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, because I'm not a sociopath I think preserving the world's ecosystems is more important than a few years at the tail end of my life. Doomsday bunker with a Mad Max stockpile wouldn't occur to me as a thing to actually do.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Okay, cool. Probably so do a lot of billionaires, at least from a pure pragmatic POV of them not wanting their skull cracked open. The point is that for a tiny portion of their wealth, they can insure against a lot of more realistic severe problems (unrest, riots, communism arising in the US, war, assassination, widespread famine), in addition to more extreme and less likely problems (doomsday, machine uprising, environmental collapse).

Frankly, were I a billionaire and able to see the choices Trump is making to make the average civilian in America jobless, penniless and hopeless, I would also be making a bunker in the wilderness or distant nation.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or you could use your indescribable wealth to prevent the things you need a bunker for.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah but you can't though. Like let's be real, you have 1bn, you're not Elon Musk or Bill Gates level - and even they would not be able to stop an angry Donald Trump

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

It's more than enough to inject a little fear into the ruling class.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Not enough to fight the bigger fish, but 1 billion dollars is more than enough to make public works that aren't just a front (all these assholes have some foundation that is, at best, a zero sum charity), making better community spaces so they'll actually see you as a "good guy" instead of yet another fucking greedy asshole.

[–] RedPostItNote@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just people building their own tombs. Being a part of society is what keeps you alive. They already crossed the boundary by essentially removing themselves from it. It’s already over for them

[–] hello@retrolemmy.com 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If an apocalypse happens I'd rather be in the bunker with all the goodies instead of outside with the roving gangs vying for control.

[–] RedPostItNote@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The worst criminals would be in there with you.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

New Zealand mostly

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Douglas Rushkoff Author, media theorist, and cool guy Does the Team Human podcast

[–] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

And they all already have, insane, there is our trickle down economics at work, they would rather hoarde and spend every last cent on a bunker right before they drop dead from old age than give back to the world

[–] plyth@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

To be fair, what could a single billionaire do? They are far more powerful than most, but they would have to cooperate with other billionaires to make that change.

There are 3000 billionaires. Who is going to stick their head out if the necessary changes will be opposed by many billionaires as well as huge parts of the regular population?

It would be better for society to improve itself instead of waiting for a solution by the billionaires. Difficult while being trained to be a consumer, but possible.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

The solution is to cull billionaires. They can lose their wealth or their heads, either will make a better society

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

They might start fighting turning on themselves