this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
424 points (98.2% liked)

Uplifting News

15096 readers
558 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

If you want everyone to have it, you patent, then charge nothing to license it.

If you don't patent it, then a corporate patent troll will come in, patent it, charge an inordinate amount for the license, then bury you in paperwork with a lawsuit so you can't fight back. Effectively killing the tech.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No, that's not how open source hardware works.

You copyright it (free) and publish online with a copyleft license.

You would absolutely win in court without the patent. Just point to the publishing date on GitHub. Then you sue them for filing a blatantly fraudulent patent.

Source: I work in open hardware

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 1 day ago

How many suits for these kinds of blatantly fraudulent patents have actually been won? And lost?

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Patents does not have defensive uses, only offensive.

You beat patent trolls by demonstrating you published first.

no defensive uses

Says someone whos never blocked an assassin's ninja star with a binder full of patent paperwork. There was also some incorporation stuff in there, but not enough to have worked with that alone.

Clearly you lack real experience in the field.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They can be defensive in a roundabout way like the x86/amd64 patents

[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

Only against practicing entities, and if you have enough cash reserves to deter them with legal expenses.