Asklemmy

43856 readers

1615 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Do you think intention is more important or perception is more important? (lemmy.today)

submitted 1 year ago by cubedsteaks@lemmy.today to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I answered this question below:

It shouldn’t matter. Even if you don’t know why someone does something there’s still an intention behind that behaviour and it matters.

Ofcourse that doesn’t mean you’re going to be fine as long as your intentions are pure even if your actions are perceived to be malicious because you might suffer the consequences from the misunderstanding but you’re still not a bad person.

The reverse of this would be a high functioning charming psychopath that’s great at manipulating people and is well liked but his intentions are to take advantage of you so they’re a truly bad person despite not being perceived as such