this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
729 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24085 readers
3186 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump signed a memo late yesterday ordering 2,000 members of the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles County after federal immigration agents in riot gear squared off with hundreds of protesters for a second consecutive day

Life isn't instant.

He ordered it, if it doesn't happen it's because someone in the chain of command is disobeyi g orders.

Not saying that's a bad thing, or that it'll happen.

But he has 100% ordered troop to be deployed and it's actively in process. The headline is 100% correct

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's not clear that he has the authority to order it, especially over the objection of the state governor. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/presidents-power-call-out-national-guard-not-blank-check is from 2024, largely about when Trump 1 ordered National Guard to DC, and why it's different in states.

TL; DR: National Guard is a state organization; if the President federalizes it, then it becomes subject to posse commitatus, same as the Army.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

It's not clear that he has the authority to order it

Yeah and the courts can argue about that while it happens. That's been his whole deal. Do whatever he wants and maybe someone will say "hey that's illegal" but by that point it's too late.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

You mean "it's clear that he does not have the authority to order it." Anything short of that helps normalize Trump's fascist lawlessness.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

if the President federalizes it, then it becomes subject to posse commitatus, same as the Army.

Which has happened before. Against Biden's wishes at the time, it was done to enforce school desegregation in the south.

Like, trump tries to pull lots of unprecedented shit, but this is precedented.

It all depends on how Newsome handles it. And Newsome is a pretty big piece of shit.

Next election for Cali gov is 2026 at least, this will push them away from neoliberals and towards a progressive willing to fight.

We're well past the point shit gets fixed quickly, doesn't mean stop fighting, just get your expectations straight.