this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
528 points (96.5% liked)

memes

15407 readers
4121 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dragonborn3810@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

AFAIK most places in Europe use brick, at least the UK does

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Northern Europe did and does.

[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I live in northern Europe in a very wooden house

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

...with house salad?

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

But like, what's the structure of the house made out of? I can't imagine the structural bits can be made out of bricks?

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

what’s the structure of the house made out of?

Reinforced concrete. It's cheap to create, the materials are quite cheap, it's very strong, and you can make it have any shape.

I never understood why the US makes strctural bits out of wood. I can understand using it on the walls, but it's completely unfit for the structure.

I'd bet most people here claiming their houses are made of bricks have a reinforced concrete structure hidden inside brick molds on the corners.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What makes wood unfit for structure? I don't know much about buildings, but it looks pretty strong and flexible to me?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing.

This person is kinda saying nonsense.

Wood is perfectly sound for structural building.

There are wooden temples in Japan dating back to the 6th(7th?) century.

A stone structure would have been shook apart by now.

Different materials have different use cases.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

To clarify for people who don't know: japan has a shit ton of earthquakes.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They use the metric system so I believe it’s a shit tonne

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Right but for earthquakes the global standard is imperial. Nobody uses metric, except the french during the paris commune, the kingdom of hawaii, and mongolia.

Maaaaaybe north korea and cuba, but definitely not vietnam; it was a whole thing in the 80s.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh my mistake you are obviously more well versed, I will only refer to earthquakes by their shit-tonnage from here on out

Not the individual earthquakes, but the quantity of them

I don't know shit about individual earthquakes.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Racism and an incessant need to feel superior to others no matter what.

[–] jellygoose@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago

The European way

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

it looks pretty strong and flexible

Compared to steel? I would recommend you check your eyesight.

It's also labor intensive, and has plenty of durability problems. Also, worst of all, there is a huge amount of problems that can weaken it but are completely invisible once you finish your walls. Problems that happen often, because of that labor intensity.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Well i mean we're talking houses here, not record-breaking high-rise buildings.

As for issues with structural wood... Tbh they're pretty rare. Probably more common than, say, the steel in your walls rusting or something, but still, not to a worrisome degree.

The main one is insects. Water (leading to mould) is also a thing but water infiltrations are terrible news no matter the material so...

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We have a lot of wood.

It’s not completely unfit for structures at all, else we wouldn’t use it.

concrete is terribly bad for the environment as it turns out.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Have you ever built a house out of Legos? It's just like that.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why not? Pretty much everything except the roof structure is made of bricks. My house is entirely bricks; an outer and an inner wall separated by a gap with insulation, with a wooden skeleton for the roof secured to the brick walls. All interior walls are either made of bricks (the originals built with the house in the 60's) or aerated concrete blocks (added in a refurbishing later in the 00's).

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m jealous of how seismically stable the area you live is.

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Bricks crumble, wood flex.

[–] SebTorres@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

From South America. Our homes are brick and concrete, with a steel structure made of thick wires. If you’ve seen a mall being built, that, but smaller. Allows you to build up, while being resistant to earthquakes

[–] brap@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep. Can’t imagine a wooden house. It sounds flimsy and loud.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Brick does really badly in earthquakes, at least without major reinforcing. 'Unreinforced masonry' can be fatal pretty easily.

Brick veneer over timber framing can be a thing.

Makes a great gift, though.

[–] brap@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That’s a really good point I’ve not thought about as I’m lucky to live somewhere without that risk.

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lucky for Europe then that it's not on major fault lines

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Which is why stone construction was possible there