this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
422 points (99.3% liked)

politics

24139 readers
2962 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Most Americans are too chicken shit to give up a few days of work. I mean, look at how these 9 to 5vers bitch and complain when people protest and it inconveniences them. They've swallowed the propaganda so hard that they applaud the police for arresting and abusing protestors. I have very little faith in my countrymen.

[–] TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I support a general strike but I'm a doctor that works primarily in an underserved community filled with many immigrants (illegal and otherwise). I would support other people striking, but I feel like I couldn't possibly stop working because my role is a lifeline for workers.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There are other ways of striking than reducing service. For example you could stop all insurance paperwork and offer your services for free for the duration of the strike. Or anything else that makes management mad and the bosses/shareholders lose money.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing this. I'd heard of this before, but being reminded of it bolstered my spirits a little.

[–] TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

So I work for a small community hospital. I have zero input on billing. My hospital is so small and broke that we end up being subsidized by the city/state most years because so many of our patients are uninsured and can't pay for our services. I can't make the hospital operate for free because I have zero influence on billing.

I do volunteer at free clinics part time.

[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is why safety nets are important. In US you can lose your job, not get unemployment and lose access to doctor.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago

And this is why the right has been systematically dismantling all safety nets for decades.

This is the end game...

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Many people can't miss a few days work without significant financial implications. Billionaires and corporations have us so underwater that we have no choice but to make a big stink where we can and voice our concern, with the occasional weekend march.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'll dare note that in the beginning of the previous century financial implications of such a strike for a worker were not just that, and it involved also possibly serious physical damage (without easily available surgery and care) and detention.

I would really like to find it in myself to do something like that, it takes a certain state of mind and a certain feeling in the air, because how do you start when nobody is yet doing it.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd say part of the difference is that, at this point, the billionaires have left us with just enough to lose. I'm sure the risk of physical violence was still daunting, but when you have nothing left to lose then the prospect of physical harm somehow seems preferable to continuing with the status quo. That seems like an easy thing to say, but I've been there before.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ah, yes, of course. That's also the distinction of Russia's situation from more classical kinds of fascism. Bad things happen, but the regime doesn't put them under your nose. Intimidation happens, but there are no public executions Nazi-style. Propaganda happens, but it's boring and one would think ineffective, except it still sticks, similar to advertising, - they've learned some lessons. Nazis were more interesting and imposing, but less efficient. This is state of the art.

Same with today's monopolies, oligopolies, rotten electoral systems, censorship.

Everything has been optimized to the last cent. Not the good old days, when the bad guys were generous with impressions.

Reminds me of Boussenard's sentiment on new uniforms in his children's book on the Boer war - no more nice glares and colors, just khaki everywhere - a symbol of efficiency, because camouflage now is treated seriously enough.

Like Intel's tick-tock. Worker movements and fascisms 100 years ago were the "tick", and now is the "tock" - boring, depressing, deadly efficient.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Very well put; this is exactly what I'm talking about.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not that they're chicken shit. They aren't even against Trump's policies.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

That, too. Even a good portion of Dems support this stupid fucks actions and "policy." And the word policy is doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Are you serious? Most Americans are scared of losing their jobs and being unable to provide for their families, including caregivers for elderly parents. Many are only a few missed payments away from having their vehicles repossessed or being evicted and becoming homeless. Some have ongoing health conditions that require insurance.

If you have nothing to lose or you have a safety net and can stop going to work, great, good job. Most people aren't in your position.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Many service members are in the same position and depend on Uncle Sam to pay their bills (and, ya know, to stay out of jail for derelicion of duty or insubordination)...hence why it might be a tad difficult to "remember their oath" and stand up against vaguely illegalish orders, which might morally preserve their soul, but crushes their ability to live. Only bringing this up because of comments in other posts related to the NG and USMC in LA, but I see a close parallel of maliciously manufactured helplessness to self-advocate.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It's an intentionally designed system, so that everyone falling out of line by themselves would hurt only themselves. It's the point of governments and militaries than everyone can be replaced.

It was always so.

Strikes are supposed to be "suicidal".

The problem is that western cultures after 60s manufactured expectation that there's no such thing among necessary ones in life. That you live for feeling nice, comfort, good things, peaceful politics. That risking your life to make a statement won't be required from you. That was initially counterpropaganda to communism, I think.