this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
338 points (98.0% liked)

politics

24177 readers
3002 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only there was a good guy with a gun to save the day.

\s

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Funny how there's almost never a good guy with a gun, like statistically almost never. There was that cowboy that shot an active shooter in a church, and I'll give props to the guy the ran into Uvalde when the uniformed bad guys were too chicken shit to save kids lives, and just hung outside. I can't think of any off the top of my head, although I know they exist, but I could prattle off at least a dozen high profile shootings.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

There was one just this weekend. A guy with a rifle popped up at a Utah No Kings rally. Two people who were on hand to protect the protesters stopped what would have almost certainly been a mass casualty event.

Sadly, an innocent bystander was killed by the defenders. And that is the real issue. Guns are extremely dangerous even when used properly. Even good guys with a gun are not perfect and innocent people are often injured or killed on accident. We have too many guns in this country and not enough regulation and enforcement.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago

Even in this case, it wasn't the random "good guy with a gun". It was a member of the peacekeeping group setup by the event organizers. IE, it was their job.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Last stat I saw was 1in 7000, but that includes cases with collateral damage.

So, for America, that's like once a year.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was that guy in colorado who shot a mass shooter, then the cops killed him

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Oof. Double dipping on the baddies with guns on that one.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Usually the good guys with guns are militia or are shot by the cops. A damned fine example I know of happened after WW2 where when a bunch of men got back to their home county they basically had to form a militia to expel the corrupt sheriff who was doing shit like ballot stuffing. Spoiler the sheriff and his mafia goons didn't stand a chance against men who just got done fighting the Imperial Japanese and Nazi Germany.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I think it was in Athens McMinn county Tennessee, specifically Athens Tennessee.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

It sounds like an interesting story, kind of a Walking Tall kind of thing.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world -2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This is sooo false it's not even funny. There are way more DGUs than there are not.

And like it or not most mass shootings are stopped by someone with a firearm.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

There are way more DGUs than there are not.

I think this is a pretty gigantic citation needed here. I couldn't find anything supporting this assertion but plenty of material showing the opposite.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Before the CDC took it off the site, they had reference to an estimated 500-2.5mil DGUs a year. DGUs are hard to estimate because a dgu can be as simple as presenting the firearm to a would be attacker and the attacker leaving the victim(s) alone. Most people don't call the police because of this.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

DGU. I didn't know they invented an initialism at the rallies.

most mass shootings are stopped by

..the perp taking his own life.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

…the perp taking his own life.

Well, technically, that is someone with a firearm I suppose...

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

It's literally a term.

And no it's not.

You stay unarmed while fascist are roaming the street.