this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
822 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

8525 readers
3389 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 13 points 23 hours ago (20 children)

You get censored and banned for pretty much anything. Lemmy is no exception and pretty obviously like that.

Seeing as I have not been banned for anything I have to disagree.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr -2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (16 children)

Depends on the things you say, where…

If you’re generally leftist, you should mostly be fine.

Otherwise you get banned for trolling (because ofc they’re right so you’re trolling) or transphobia, because if you don’t agree with everything a trans person says, you’re transphobic. Also, the world belongs to them.

Talk about lesser known subjects by the public or make a mistake yourself? Thats it, you’re banned for misinformation and trolling. Or being a nazi or racist or whatever. The words don’t have a meaning anymore

Also the random ban reasons like "Rule 3" which refers to the most open and subjective rules like "Be civil" or "Dont be a dick" or similar

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Sounds like a lot of generalizing. Probably deserved your ban to be honest.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Believe whatever you want. I’m saying that based on my experience.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, and you made a pretty blanket statement about all trans people, or ig all trans people on Lemmy, based on your experience with like, a handful of people?

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If you want an example, I said trans athletes being in man or women categories is a debate and shouldn’t be allowed by default because of inequalities between the individuals, and true equality can never be reached.

I believe the use of "biological men" trigged them when I said that transgender women were that… when I was talking about scientific stuff to make my point.

Super transphobic, watch out! ☢️ -_-

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

man or women categories is a debate and shouldn’t be allowed by default because of inequalities between the individuals, and true equality can never be reached.

Studies have found the only Olympic events in which trans women might have an advantage over cis women is mid range sprints. There has been no advantage shown in the short or long sprint events nor any other categories.

If you want to talk about equality in sports the biggest inequality that affects outcomes is money. Athletes with more money poured into them for training and equipment have a significant advantage over other athletes.

[–] ipitco@lemmy.super.ynh.fr -1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Studies did not find that there’s a lack of advantage as well, therefore why use it as a point? What I meant is that there’s place for a debate on this question.

There has been no advantage shown in the short or long sprint events nor any other categories.

I’ll have to disagree with you on this. Based on my research I did not find conclusive evidence on this. A sample size inferior to thousands is not sufficient to test anyways.

Athletes with more money poured into them for training and equipment have a significant advantage over other athletes.

That’s a well known problem. Sadly, not much we can do to fix it without creating other problems. We’re all unequal on this :(

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 minutes ago

I’ll have to disagree with you on this. Based on my research I did not find conclusive evidence on this.

Well based on my research if we stop arguing about trans people in sports and just let people play (because sports don't actually matter) everyone on earth will become billionaires!

It's easy to say things, I really do not care what some rando on the Internet came up with by "doing their own research" unless they have receipts. That's how we got anti-vaxxers and flat earthers.

That’s a well known problem. Sadly, not much we can do to fix it without creating other problems

So we know this is a problem but fixing it isn't important. Trans people in sports we don't know is a problem, trying to "fix" it is creating other problems, so why is that more important to focus on?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)