this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
939 points (98.7% liked)

memes

15625 readers
3865 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

It makes no difference cost wise to save a few cms of wood.

The cost savings is not only in materials. For manufacturing, lower quality materials and larger tolerances. Time to install and repair is lower because of how open the design is. Time to clean is lower because you can just soak the floor and mop without worrying about each stalls' corners.

Brutal efficiency at the cost of comfort and privacy is what capitalism is all about. The US is just used to it and somehow also incredibly puritanical.

That said, efficiency isn't a bad thing. There are some countries with some bathrooms that don't have stalls - legit indoor public bathrooms where you just squat over a hole or urinals that are just one long wide trough. It's about what you are used to.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Nah I refuse to accept its for efficiency or cost savings. Thats so negligible no one would bring it up. Especially at the scale these are being constructed.

Ive seen a ton of arguments like "oh its to save costs installing if the floor is uneven" or "it gives leeway for different cuts" or "its for cleaning" but these are things can can easily be designed around without having a gap that leaves the user exposed. Either Americans are to stupid to design around this constraint (they aren't) or theyre intentionally leaving it in for some reasons and there is plenty of speculation on the reasons.

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You're correct, those things are avoidable and can be designed around. However hiring the people who know how to do that also costs money and it's cheaper to hire shitty engineers who do things safely instead of well. We're not stupid, we're exploitative

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 hours ago

If you're gonna build hundreds of thousands of bathrooms you can afford a decent engineer to make a door. Look at any other country, even the poor ones.