this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
799 points (99.4% liked)

News

30274 readers
3891 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The home, which was run by an order of Catholic nuns and closed in 1961, was one of many such institutions that housed tens of thousands of orphans and unmarried pregnant women who were forced to give up their children throughout much of the 20th century.

In 2014, historian Catherine Corless tracked down death certificates for nearly 800 children who died at the home in Tuam between the 1920s and 1961 — but could only find a burial record for one child.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Scopes reports that the babies were buried in an adjacent structure and that the number is undetermined. An amateur published that number without evidence.

Until additional information is uncovered, it is not possible if the grave was a result of legitimate or initiate reasons.

https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/06/18/796-children-septic-tank-ireland/

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 38 minutes ago

Honestly, I'm disgusted how you misquote Snopes in an attempt to smear the historian and to gloss over the atrocities committed at Tuam and similar facilities.

The Snopes article pretty much contradicts your comment entirely.

Other Sources:

[–] PolydoreSmith@lemmy.world 11 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

You say the number is inaccurate, which begs the question: what exactly is an acceptable number of infant remains to find in an orphanage septic tank?

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

There’s an extensive Wikipedia article outlining known facts and atrocities - dumping the bodies is probably the least atrocious thing they’ve done.

EDIT: I believe OP is trying to distract from the atrocities by focussing on a minor one and misquoting Snopes.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

Raises. It raises the question.

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 hours ago

If you read the scopes article, the number is zero and zero is a great number. "The human remains found by the Commission are not in a sewage tank but in a second structure with 20 chambers..." How did these children die? Were they murdered? Was there a pandemic? Neglect? Famine? Over what time range was this collective grave used?

After the story in Canada that sparked the burning of multiple churches was found out to be entirely false, I'm going to wait for actual facts here.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, what an awful but fascinating read. Really changes the perspective on this.

It wasnt a place that harmed or neglected children, but rather a place that housed the most vulnerable at a difficult time and endured immense hardship.

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 54 minutes ago

Actually it was a place that harmed, neglected and even tortured children.

"There can be no Justice without redress for survivors and that redress must be paid for by Religious Orders who have harvested enormous wealth by inflicting misery and death on the most vulnerable in our society.

There can be no Justice without an Inquest into the dead of Tuam. They died horribly and unnecessarily. They had no life as children. The State owes them the dignity of an Inquest and a Death Certificate that truly shows why they died.

There can be no more betrayals of our dead children."

Source: Tuam Home Survivors

Also check out the Wikipedia article. The investigations and excavations are ongoing, so there will be proof of even more atrocities uncovered.