this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1087 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

71953 readers
3469 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Panties@lemmy.ca 196 points 2 days ago (50 children)

No earphone jack again. That's a bit sad. Even though I mainly use BLT earbuds, I still sometimes wish I could use my wired headphones. It's just a small inconvenience

[–] wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago

Honestly feels criminal with how bloated companies have made these phones yet they cheap out on a headphone jack.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (17 children)

Not having a headphone jack is just a slap in the face from a company whose whole image is supposed to be longevity and eco-friendly.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Laser@feddit.org 57 points 2 days ago (26 children)

I had a phone without before, that one came with a simple cheap passive adapter for USB-C to 3.5mm headset. You lose out on using headphones while charging, but other than that I was never really inconvenienced...

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That means the audio still goes through another DAC, lowering the sound quality, compared to an analog 3.5 jack. Also, who wants to further risk wearing out\vreaking their charge port, jack inputs almost seem like they can't break.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically it only goes through 1 dac, not "another one". But still, yeah, your phone's dac is most likely a lot better than the one on a $10 adapter. However, the usb-c spec does allow an analog audio signal passthrough. Whether that's available or not depends on the phone I guess.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too bad LG got out of the phone biz. They had the best dacs and some good phones.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 22 hours ago

Damn right. LG G5 for example was a pretty interesting concept that could've evolved into something cool.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 81 points 2 days ago (20 children)

After having a phone without a 3.5mm port or a microSD card slot, the top 2 features I want on a phone are a 3.5mm port and a microSD card slot.

Shame Sony discontinued their Xperia 5 series, even if they were also excessively priced.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I disagree about this being a good solution. USB-C is not meant to take the strain of being used as an audio port when being used in the go so there is risk of damaging the port while a headphone jack is more stable and allows the plug to rotate. Plus I don't want to have a dingle I can forget when in a rush.

[–] PrinzKasper@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plus I don't want to have a dingle I can forget when in a rush.

Just have the dongle permanently attached to your earbuds like it's a part of the cable.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Awesome solution. Remove the port that everything used to have and make consumers buy adapters. I have like 5 headphones. Should I go buy an adapter for each one? Not to mention that I can easily fix a headphone cable but if a 3.5 to usb-c adapter breaks, it basically becomes junk.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)