this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
249 points (97.3% liked)
xkcd
11723 readers
103 users here now
A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm going to need someone to adjust the model for instances in which an F-22 starts shooting them down.
How about when an unhinged person in the White House starts defunding NWS and launches get cancelled (yes - happening already).
"Dabei war'n dort am Horizont
Nur 99 Luftballons."
The red ones go faster
All the fighter jets in the world couldn't make a tiny dent in one trillion balloons.
What about this?
It looks like the dart took out about a half dozen lights and a dozen people in about two seconds, so let's say 10 strikes per second. At that rate it would take 10^11 seconds to pop a trillion balloons. That's more than 3000 years!
Of course I did say "make a tiny dent," but even to eliminate 0.1% of the balloons would take the dart 3 years. One trillion is a number that we use a lot, for example talking about the US national debt, but it is not an ordinary number that lends itself to intuitive understanding. Even a billion is hard to grasp intuitively.
Let's just light the atmosphere on fire. Sounds like the quickest solution. Surely there can't be any downsides.
I'd just shoot doem down with FLAC cannons
Good idea using the Free Lossless Audio Codec that will sound way better than mp3 when the balloons all pop.
We need more jets right away!
Not if we build it one trillion of them.