this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
156 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

71921 readers
3585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By 25 July, all sites and apps that allow pornography – whether they are dedicated adult sites or social media, search or gaming services – must use highly effective age checks to ensure children are not normally able to encounter it. Online firms who publish their own pornography are already required to protect children from it, and thousands of sites have already introduced robust age checks in response. 

Major porn providers operating in the UK have confirmed to Ofcom that they will introduce effective checks by next month’s deadline in order to comply with the new rules. They include PornHub, the most-visited pornographic service in the UK. Other services who are happy to be named at this stage include BoyfriendTV, Cam4, FrolicMe, inxxx, Jerkmate, LiveHDCams, MyDirtyHobby, RedTube, Streamate, Stripchat, Tube8, and YouPorn. This represents a broad range of pornography services accessed in the UK.

Monitoring compliance with these new duties is a priority for Ofcom. If any company fails to comply with its new duties, Ofcom can impose fines and – in very serious cases – apply for a court order to prevent the site or app from being available in the UK. As part of our work enforcing the Online Safety Act, we have already launched investigations into four porn providers and won’t hesitate to take further action from July.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

People are not gonna agree with me but, it makes sense to have age verification just like you have to verify your age for tobacco or alcohol.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Is there a paper linking gooning to cancer, why would you compare those things

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I love this comment. Thank you!

[–] RepleteLocum@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I don’t agree with him, but there are certainly health issues stemming from porn consumption.
Be it ed, or a mental health issue.

[–] Maxxie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago

In what world is that risk comparable to cigarettes?

Even comparing it to junk food is a stretch, and nobody suggests we put age verification on chips.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

My mental health is going to be equally fucked with or without porn. As for ED, I'm the only person I need to please so as the Aussies say; she'll be right.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Would it make sense for alcohol age verification if every household had beer taps installed? Because thats what internet is.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Its certainly the parents responsibility to make sure those kids dont drink. And if they do, there should be repercussions just like we have the same expectations with Gun use.

But it's disanalgous anyways. We make stores and establishments check for IDs. These websites are no different from these establishments, therefore they should also verify the age.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Its disingenuous to compare information flow to physical markets. They're not the same thing.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl -3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah porn is definitely just "information flow", there's nothing beyond it and it can't affect minor individuals. Really? That's not disingenuous? So online gambling shouldn't be age restricted? There's no "physical" aspect to it.

Oh let's not forget, it certainly doesn't objectify women.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I mean it literally is just information flow - no? Doesn't mean it can't be harmful or dangerous but thats what it is and you equating to actions like gambling just show how's actually ignorant you are being here. Have a good day and don't reply to me thanks.