this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
1245 points (95.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35514 readers
60 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

EDIT: The only reason why I still had it at this point was because I could use it with other apps. However, now that my Spotify Subscription is cancelled, it doesn't work with anything. It's mildly infuriating because today, I can't still use it with other apps like I was able to yesterday.

Please don't make the same mistake I made. No one should buy this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 360 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The system working as intended. Now you're "locked in".

[–] airportline@lemmy.ml 109 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sadly he is always right. I wish he was wrong all the time.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd check his wikipedia page before throwing around "always" like that.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank Faust there are times he is wrong! At least I know we live in not the worst world imaginable.

[–] babeuh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Controversies section of his Wikipedia page is euh interesting to say the least. He said some things that are not remotely acceptable

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh even without the controversies, the eating of miscellaneous foot attachments is wrong enough on its own.

Edit: I do btw fully agree with rms being a crude piece of failed excrement

[–] uis@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny you mentioned RedHat's cancelation of Stallman.

[–] babeuh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I didn't mention that? I don't write on Wikipedia.

But don't you think his views on pedophilia are unacceptable? He says he has changed his mind and that's great but doesn't excuse what he said.

I usually agree with his views on software but the rest is often questionable

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Just find another ~~job~~ ~~place to live~~ head unit"

-deliberately obtuse bootlickers

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Something tells me they just didn't realize someone would buy a Spotify car play without already having a subscription.

I mean really, you're too cheap for 9.99/m but you'll drop 100 bucks for something your phone already does?

Seems like OP is just in a very unique situation that Spotify didn't expect anyone to be in.

[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They say never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by neglect, ignorance or incompetence. But with a corporations I'm pretty sure its the other way around.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd usually agree but this product seems exclusively intended for someone who's heavily into Spotify, and the marketing clearly states you need a subscription.

[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and the marketing clearly states you need a subscription.

So they knew. It was by design.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Knew what? That people buying the device already have one?

You still have it backwards. They didn't sell you the device to get you on the subscription, they assumed only people with money to spend on a subscription would WASTE A HUNDRED BUCKS ON SOME DUMB SHIT LIKE THIS.

[–] monkeytennis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Am I missing something, or would basically any old smartphone work in place of this? I have a Pixel which sits in a cradle and takes care of anything I'd use this for. I guess a physical button or dial might be nice, but I have a volume dial on the car dash.

Seems plainly obvious that it'll require a sub. It's a Spotify box.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're correct, I have a five or six year old kindle fire i got for like 60 bucks that I rooted and installed stock android on, it's just a really cheap tablet now. Works perfectly for stuff like this.

My last smartphone would also have worked.

This whole thread is just a bunch of moron-consumer apologists. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to hate corporations and their practices, but this is just a bad purchase and buyers remorse packaged as big corpos fault.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, on all the purchase advertisements they said you must have Spotify premium to use this.

They subsidized the price the device based on the expected return from convincing people to keep their subscriptions. Since it supports other clients they probably also have to manage software updates.

Spotify is a bag of dicks for a lot of other reasons but this really doesn't seem to be one of them.

[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They could have fixed that when they discontinued them quite easily.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

9.99/m is 119.88/y and it doesn't stop. Maybe OP thought that the purchase was a one time purchase, and I don't really blame him, since why would the thing exist if phones with a subscription can already do that it does?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't really blame him

He bought a piece of convenience tech designed for a specific piece of software, when said convenience tech is totally unnecessary to the function of that software, then got mad that he needed the software

I am shocked that everyone in this thread isn't roasting this dude nonstop. He's an idiot.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They just don't consider personal responsibility to even exist. It's the corporation's fault they spent a hundred bucks on a thing your old phone and a 15 dollar magnetic mount could have done for you, because said device needs a subscription service.

I had a guy tell me in this thread that I had "privilege" for saying Spotify didnt expect people without a paid subscription to be spending money on such an overpriced device. OP is throwing hundo's away on stupid shit but it HAS to be the corpos fault somehow, people will toss logic right out the window to keep the cognitive dissonance at bay.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Doesn't stop? You sign on the dotted line for a lifetime of payments? You can't cancel your subscription?

since why would the thing exist if phones with a subscription can already do that it does?

That's the exact logic that would lead someone with an ounce of intelligence to go "oh yeah, this product is a completely stupid piece of shit that's marketed toward people with more money than brain cells."

Did it say anywhere on the package that it gets you a lifetime subscription to Spotify? No. Does OP understand that Spotify works on a subscription model? Probably, Saas isnt fucking new.

This is the kind of boy-who-cried-wolf bullshit that keeps corporations from actually being held accountable, because people who want better worker's rights and taxes on corporations look like idiots when lumped in with children like you who consider personal responsibility and thinking for yourself to be too scawy.