this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
54 points (96.6% liked)

Programming

17398 readers
140 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
54
The Little Things: The Missing Performance in std::vector (codingnest.com)
submitted 1 year ago by MarekKnapek@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gladaed@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, but why did you not use emplace?

[–] robinm@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

emplace controls the construction of the object added to the collection. It's also important but not related to the problem exposed by OP which is “how to remove the capacity check when we know statically that there is enough space”.