this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
541 points (98.9% liked)
Technology
60111 readers
2509 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Well hopefully it won’t be up to McDonald’s.
Let me introduce you to lobbying, and also hiring some lawyers to argue in the company's favor.
Damn, I really wish you hadn’t
Yeah, I wish it wasn't such a big factor weighed so heavily in McDonald's favor.
It actually doesn't help or harm McDonald's Corporate at all on this issue. That's why they've been fine with the status quo. It would help McDonald's franchisees quite a bit, so I suspect McDonald's won't send lobbyists to deal with what they view as a non-issue.
Taylor, the manufacturer of the machines on the other hand stands to lose a significant percentage of the profits they currently make, and absolutely does have a dog in this fight. Thankfully they don't have McDonald's type funding, so it's possible that we can win this one.
A company like iFixit you mean? Both sides can play that game. I'll grant you that McDonalds probably have more money to burn on bribes but still.
Based on a quick search, iFixit's revenue is around 50m a year while McDonald's is 24 billion. It's not even comparable lol