this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2169 points (94.2% liked)

World News

39004 readers
3383 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The fact that you're bringing up Japan (which is massively overblown - you're at more radiation risk from a coal power plant) shows you're not serious about this.

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m curious about the radiation risk from a coal power plant, are radioactive carbon isotopes generated in the coal firing process?

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here's an article - coal naturally contains trace amounts of radioactive elements and burning a bunch of it concentrates them.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Carbon contains radioactive isotopes and if you use a lot of it to generate electricity you end up with a lot of it in a single spot. It's specifically carbon-14 you measure when using radiocarbon dating to estimate how old an item is.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

... approximately 2,000 coal samples from the Western United States ... concentrations of uranium fall in the range from slightly below 1 to 4 parts per million (ppm). ... Coals with more than 20 ppm uranium are rare in the United States. Thorium concentrations in coal fall within a similar 1–4 ppm range, ... Coals with more than 20 ppm thorium are extremely rare.

https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/fs163-97/FS-163-97.html

concentrations of coals in China are estimated based on uranium analyses of 1535 coal samples ... Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous (J3–K1), and Eogene and Neogene (E–N) coals are 2.91, 5.43, 3.67, 1.18, 1.84, and 3.92 μg/g, respectively. The overall average weighted uranium concentration of coals in China is 2.31 μg/g.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544206001113

AFAIK that's 1.18-5.43 ppm.

Obviously, when you burn that, it gets concentrated.

[–] NiftyBeaks@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to ignorance. They probably really do care but have little formal education and also the algorithms have decided to send them to a particular bubble of the internet.