655
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it -3 points 1 year ago

Automation replaces manual works, AI replaces intellectual ones. No need for cheap labor in the short term.

[-] nomecks@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

You know what's in short supply right now? People who know how to automate stuff.

[-] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 9 points 1 year ago

I am at risk of losing my own job since it can be quite easily replaced by AI. The original post was about people having to die, so I hope to be counted in that number.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Wait I can get paid for that? Haha suckers my hourly rate is fucking steep.

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

We will automate that.

[-] Deme@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago

Robots cost money. Sweatshop slaves work for food.

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Robots don't sleep. They don't get sick. They don't have federally mandates days off. They don't commit self delete via rooftop if you overwork them. If you can be replaced by something that can do your job at 10% the speed for 1% the total cost, you will be. Such is the way of capitalist automation.

[-] Aviandelight@mander.xyz 19 points 1 year ago

I have never seen automation fully replace the need for human workers. You still need people to maintain the equipment. All automation does is increase the amount of output. And when you start running machines at capacity you find out real quick just how much maintenance they really need.

[-] BloodForTheBloodGod@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Robots do get sick, it's called needing maintenance.

[-] Slotos@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Robots also do exactly what you tell them to.

[-] sveri@lemmy.sveri.de 3 points 1 year ago

Half of what you say is true. But robots are expensive, in many cases way more expensive than child labours around the world. And while it's possible to have robots do grunt work, true AI is still far away, like several decades.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The kind of sophisticated AI and robotics that can replace a human is much further away than some people seem to realize. That kind of technology doesn’t even exist in a lab. It will be decades before anything approaching that level even exists, and decades more before it’s an affordable, practical, mass-produced option. Even huge corporations that have the budget to invest won’t have the opportunity for quite a while.

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

AI learns from existing human work. Without innovation it will learn nothing of value.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
655 points (95.8% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2486 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS