this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2173 points (94.2% liked)

World News

39110 readers
2398 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't really know anything about this topic, but I heard there are new designs of nuclear fission plants that are much safer and "unmeltdownable"? Called Molten Salt Reactors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt_reactor

[–] tycho@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, but afaik corrosion is still a big issue in these designs so they are not ready for commercial use.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's molten salt reactors. I learned it as small modular reactors (SMR) which naturally cooled to safe temperatures if they lost power and water.

[–] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, but it still expensive and it makes +30% of wastes

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but we shouldn't be using only one type of nuclear reactor anyway -- we can deploy the SMR design for more populated areas where safety is paramount, and then run breeder reactors in uninhabited areas to convert the SMR waste back into fuel.

[–] dbilitated@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure the only reactors that have ever failed have been designed in the 60s and early 70s (or earlier)

I'm trying to confirm it but I'm pretty sure no reactor designed later than that has had a meltdown and there have been significantly safer designs released in the last couple of decades.

I can look it up later if you're curious but I recall reading some interesting articles about it.