this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2023
1255 points (92.1% liked)

Showerthoughts

31134 readers
1392 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 92 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I refuse to accept Texas' claim on y'all. Its a word collectively owned by everyone south of the mason-dixon line and I will fight to the death over this.

Signed, floridaman

[–] Intralexical@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (7 children)

…Am I not allowed to use "y'all", north of the 49th parallel? Do we have to bring back "thou" so "you" can be plural again? Or is this part of the Quebecois plot to force everyone to parler en français donc nous pouvons utiliser "vous"? C'est bien, anyway, j'suppose.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fun fact:

"Thou" and "you" were the same word.

The "th" sound used to have its own character in written English called the thorn. When typefaces came along, it was excluded and sometimes replaced with a "y."

Also why "Ye" and "The" are the same.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is it bad that I'm more bothered by "j'suppose" than the inclusion of "anyway"?

[–] Intralexical@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

C'est un trait quebecois, je pense.... les cowboys fringants la dit ("anyway"), donc je ne sais, c'est probablement ok.... J'ai entendu "j'suppose" avant aussi, vraiment, je pense..? Est-ce que ça n'est pas comme "I'spose" en anglais? Reverso a beaucoup des examples pour "j'suppose", quand même. (Je ne suis pas quebecois ou francophone, si tu ne peut pas voir pour quelque raison; je suis un idiot anglophone.)

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"I'spose" est facile. "J'suppose" est dur à dire, parce qu'on ne peut pas dire "j's" comme "i's".

J'ai dû sortir mon français rouillé. Merci pour la pratique. Et oui, j'ai utilisé Google.

[–] Intralexical@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

“I’spose” est facile. “J’suppose” est dur à dire, parce qu’on ne peut pas dire “j’s” comme “i’s”.

Eh, je ne sais. C'est plus difficile que "I'spose", oui, mais je pense que c'est ok.. Les cowboys fringants dit aussi "j'te", "j'rentre", et probablement les autres consonnes aussi, donc, généralement, je l'imagine comme si on bredouille un peu.

J’ai dû sortir mon français rouillé. Merci pour la pratique. Et oui, j’ai utilisé Google.

Et la même à toi! Mais j'utilise Google pour traduire du français vers l'anglais, après avoir premièrement écrit la français avec Collins et quelquefois Reverso (mon professeur français a toujours aimé ça). Je fais des corrections alors peut-être. Ainsi, Google me dit si j'ai fait des grosses erreurs, mais je pratique mon français tout seul.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 years ago

Well, I'm doing my best to import it into the New Zealand vernacular, we are South of the 49th.

So, uh, I dunno.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago

I hear it all the time. I use it sometimes

-just south of the 49*

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Take it from the south; it will kill them inside.

[–] Matthew@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

It's not that it can't be used elsewhere. We just don't want Texas to take all the credit.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You can use yall but the "L"s are quieter the further north you go such that they're silent near the border

"How ya doin" is simply plural above the 49th

[–] ilex@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Everyone gets y'all. It fills the dumb gap in English where the plural of you is you. Now if we could only get a singular neutral 3rd for people that isn't also the plural.

E: Or we could start pronouncing They singular like latchkey, for a thee sound. So we can get fun words like they's (thees). It will also make English even more confusing for newbies. What's not to love?

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

If the plural of goose is geese, then the plural of moose is meese.

I approve of this message, are y'all with me?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So long as we can still claim "Y'all'd'nt've"

It's our greatest contribution to the lexicon and extremely efficient.

[–] optissima@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

You can't, that's Appalachian territory.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's also second person plural (or singular), second person is always ungendered.

First and second person, plural and singular are never gendered: I, you, we, you / y'all / all y'all. The only pronouns that are gendered are the third person singular: he / she / it. Third person plural (they) is also ungendered.

[–] FunctionFn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The most common form (at least where I'm from) of second person plural behind "you all (y'all)" is gendered: "you guys". It's used in an ungendered way increasingly commonly, but "guy" is still gendered to plenty of English speakers.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

"Guys" is sometimes gendered, sometimes not. There really isn't a female-gendered equivalent to "you guys". You could say something like "you gals", but that's just not used. Most often you could say "could you guys follow me?" to a group of women and nobody would think twice about it.