Technology

59429 readers

2693 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

473

X/Twitter has updated its Terms of Service to let it use Posts for AI training (stackdiary.com)

submitted 1 year ago by skilledtothegills@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Here's the kicker: based on these AI-assigned definitions in the updated terms, your access to certain content might be limited, or even cut off. You might not see certain tweets or hashtags. You might find it harder to get your own content seen by a broader audience. The idea isn't entirely new; we've heard stories of shadow banning on Twitter before. But the automation and AI involvement are making it more sophisticated and all-encompassing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not anti-AI but the movement is highly against mega corp scrapping personal data as well, not just open scrapping.

As a simple example Co-Pilot has been under heavy fire from the anti-ai community for a while now due to the usage of open licensed code without attribution.

[–] coheedcollapse@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But it won't matter, because a mega corp scraping data is going to put it into their TOS and literally zero percent of these people are going to get off Twitter or Bluesky or whatever big website that has an exemption to whatever law is passed to stop the scraping of data.

The only groups who will suffer will be researchers, open source software builders, and pretty much anyone who isn't a corporation already.

There's no solution to this that will end with everyone being 100% happy, but keeping the open internet open and continuing this idea that has pretty much persisted from the beginning of the internet, that whatever you put out there is fair game for viewing, is ideal compared to the alternative.

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I take issue with literally zero percent.

How many of us came here over the reddit debacle? I can tell you for certain it isn’t zero.

[–] coheedcollapse@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I shouldn't have said "literally zero", but considering how small our community here is compared to Reddit, or Mastodon compared to X, it is, arguably, functionally zero, and something as obscure as a TOS change that allows scraping for AI is much less likely to drive many people off of a site as something as drastic as destroying the entire mobile app ecosystem, ala Reddit.

[–] FredericChopin_@feddit.uk 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re most probably correct and I was just being overly pedantic.

[–] coheedcollapse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I get it - I appreciate the correction anyway!