this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
1084 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59665 readers
3772 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xhieron@lemmy.world 271 points 1 year ago (16 children)

This is very upsetting to me--more as a point of principle than in fact--but I appreciate that it doesn't bother younger generations at all. I just had a small argument with my 11 year old about how not-a-big-deal-who-cares this is, and it basically ended with us agreeing to disagree since it'll be his problem and his kids' problem.

And the problem is normalizing the notion that an OS doesn't need to include a non-subscription word processor. The entire point of this move is to shift the OS Overton Window in favor of consumers accepting and expecting that features like word processors, spreadsheets, etc., should be installed separately and paid for on a subscription basis despite previous iterations of the same software being feature complete on install and purchased at a set, non-recurring fee.

WordPad hasn't been anybody's first choice for a word processor in years, but it was included with Windows and did the bare minimum for unsophisticated users. Now we're entering an era in which those users will as a matter of course buy off-the-shelf computers that come pre-installed without WordPad, but rather with a trial of Office Fuck-You-Pay-Me Edition. Those users may well discover that after their first six months with their new computer (that has made Microsoft more money selling their data than they paid for it), they suddenly get a pop-up informing them that their trial is up and MS wants $99.99 to release the documents they're holding hostage.

It's a step backwards for consumers in general, so even for the sophisticated of us who are least likely to be personally affected by this change, there's definitely cause for alarm.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social 135 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I get where you're coming from but I think you're overstating the impact in this day and age. If this had been 1995 it'd be a big deal. Now it's rediculously easy to install any alternative you like for free.

Libre Office is an entire free fully features office suite.

I'm less bothered about removing WordPad than I am about Microsoft advertising and pre-installing it's products in Windows - they force Edge on people, they push OneDrive and preinstall a preview of Office. That's the real problem - not losing WordPad.

At one point Anti-Trust / Anti-monopoly regulators globally punished Microsoft for pushing Internet Explorer to consumers and for a long time in Europe had to offer a choice of Browsers to download on new Windows installs. Now it's allowed to get away with abusing it's dominant position to force it's products on consumers.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Does liber office make .docx files and export to pdf?

[–] tool@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

Does liber office make .docx files and export to pdf?

It does. It's fine as a replacement for Word, but no one has an answer for Excel. LibreOffice Calc is fine for a basic spreadsheet, but Excel is in a completely different universe than Calc with anything beyond that.

To be fair though, Excel is in a completely different universe than literally any other competing product.

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think calc is fine for a lot of use cases. I use it all the time. It is different though.

For advanced stuff I’d rather use Python anyway to be honest.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It wouldn't be as good as everyone says if it didn't.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

Yes, and recent versions of MS Word can also read odt, so no need for docx just to work with Word users.

[–] talos@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I built a new PC two months ago and it's the first time I didn't get Office. Libre Office has everything I need and it's free.

[–] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've wondered about free suites like these - how do they make money, do you know?

[–] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They don’t. Libre Office is maintained by a non-profit called The Document Foundation. They’re funded entirely by donations. I think they make enough to have some full time employees.

A lot of open source software is created by individuals or non-profits. The Mozilla foundation makes Firefox, for instance. They make money through donations and also Google pays them a ton of money to be the default search engine.

There are for profit companies that make or contribute to open source software. Such as Red Hat. They tend to make money by selling support for the software.

[–] talos@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think they make money. It's an open source project where people donate their time as far as I know.

EDIT: I forgot to mention you can donate to the project. Something has to pay for web hosting, I guess.

[–] LinuxSBC@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

A bit of donations, a bit of unpaid people contributing just to help others.

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Donations. Volunteers.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 67 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'd like to normalize the notion that an OS shouldn't include any application software except for a browser you can use to install other things. Let people pick what they want to use and install it themselves.

[–] sik0fewl@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, just download LibreOffice or use a free service like Google Docs.

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

You can even use Microsoft Word for free online.

The whole argument that "a subscription service becomes necessary" is nonsense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn't there an anti trust or monopoly suite against Microsoft for bundled IE back in the day? Funny how times change, though I agree it's not easy to get a preferred browser without one. Mean it never was overly simple but they were on so many CDs mailed out back then. Think it has to do with some IE and Windows integration too so not just cause they bundled it.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

The problem with IE4 is that it was designed in such a way that it was deeply integrated into the operating system, such that it could not be uninstalled.

It's completely reasonable now to ship an operating system without a browser, as long as there's some kind of "app store" or "package manager" through which a user can install whatever browser they want (provided it's available through said store, of course).

[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Better yet, the OS should just include a desktop environment with simple utilities and a package manager to install the applications you want. It will make users less likely to run into malware while searching for the programs in the web

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] danielton@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 27 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Yeah, even Apple includes the iWork suite (Pages, Numbers, and Keynote) for free on Macs and iPads, no subscription needed.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tbh I use Notepad way more than anything for note making.
If it needs to be formatted, OneNote is free to use and can be saved in any cloud (if there is a shortcut like OneDrive or Dropbox in the Windows explorer)
If it needs to be free and not very sophisticated, I'd look around for a markdown based editor.

If all of that fails, I will use Word.
Never used Wordpad in 15 years (of 24 years of existence) except while trying to open word but Windows suggesting Wordpad first.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i use wordpad a lot for viewing docs (loads faster, uncluttered ui). occasionally writing them... and more than once instead of notepad for a text file (on a system without a notepad alternative available) because i needed more features.

i have a few clients that use wordpad as their 'word processor', lack of spelling check be damned.

microsoft must have run out of excuses for specifically not including one in it, seeing how recent windows has spell check baked-in to the os itself. so instead of losing a few dozen sales of office home and student or 365 by making wordpad just a little bit better for those who use it, they're gonna be the assholes and take it out completely and push everyone to the damn cloud app or a 365 sub. fk 'em.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google Docs is free and has basically become the standard word processor for the “unsophisticated users” you’re worried about. It essentially comes with your OS because you only need a browser to use it.

I think your kid and his children will survive.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Making things in Google Docs is fine, but last I checked Google Docs just sucked at opening anything that wasn't already a GDoc. LibreOffice Writer sometimes has formatting errors opening Word Docs, but it does a miles better job than Google Docs.

Also, I hate how normalized everything using the cloud (aka "Someone Else's Hard Drive") for no reason is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HelloHotel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it still has strings attached, its not truly "free". heck, google won't let it be word pad had no ties to Microsoft once it was given to you. everything else but LibreOffice and some others still have its creator's ties.

[–] cloaker@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Advertise and push Foss substitutes like libreoffice.

[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

could go a step further and bin windows altogether.

granted, it's a big step for most.

[–] cloaker@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Love Linux, love windows. 'ate mac, simple as.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mihnt@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Be part of the 3%! Join today!

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Likely scenario, honestly.
I really don't worry about it, though.
Not to brag, but it doesn't bother me.
Understand, there is a solution.
X marks the spot.

(Yeah, I know, that's kind of stupid. But it seemed funny in my head.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

It’s too bad Linux isn’t more normalized. For those very simple users (and for the more sophisticated) Linux is probably much better than Windows at this point.

No ads, free software, updates can be very simple and stable, less security issues.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Then they ask their grandson or work it dept what they should do and both will answer libre office is free

load more comments (7 replies)