this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
12 points (87.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers
768 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

USA:

  • Prison slavery abolished

  • Elected judges with term limits

  • Ranked Choice Voting

  • Bodily autonomy as a right (no banning abortions, gender transitioning, bionics)

  • Separation of Church and State as the actual law of the land

  • Add federal referendums, all constitutional amendments are referendums (but amendments still require 75% of the population)

  • Districts are now no bigger than 50,000 people and they all get a representitive, and all the recognized Amerindian tribes also get their own reps (an agreement was made with the Cherokee for them to get one but it was never fulfilled)

  • 2nd Amendment replaced with something that directly allows federal government to regulate but not ban firearms.

[โ€“] salarua@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

i wouldn't go with ranked choice voting. all the systems i know of have their own flaws: IRV can have really weird results with more than three candidates, Borda count disproportionately favors the moderate, and the Condorcet method can completely fail to select a winner. instead, what about approval voting, where instead of ranking candidates, you just check as many boxes as you want?

[โ€“] Psephomancy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

and the Condorcet method can completely fail to select a winner.

That one's not a flaw. All elections can suffer from ties. Pure Condorcet just makes it obvious when there's a tie (and this is very rare). There are a bunch of Condorcet completion methods for resolving the tie.

[โ€“] abejfehr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I wonder if the body autonomy thing would work against for you mandating vaccines

[โ€“] Chrisosaur@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Iโ€™m not big on elected judges. Iโ€™d rather keep them appointed so they wouldnโ€™t have to pander to anyone.

[โ€“] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Appointed judges already failed to prevent that.

Yeah I know, but elections are an overcompensation. Adding term limits and throwing in some anti-corruption reforms would be better I think.