1917
submitted 1 year ago by eee@lemm.ee to c/workreform@lemmy.world

As part of his Labor Day message to workers in the United States, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday re-upped his call for the establishment of a 20% cut to the workweek with no loss in pay—an idea he said is "not radical" given the enormous productivity gains over recent decades that have resulted in massive profits for corporations but scraps for employees and the working class.

"It's time for a 32-hour workweek with no loss in pay," Sanders wrote in a Guardian op-ed as he cited a 480% increase in worker productivity since the 40-hour workweek was first established in 1940.

"It's time," he continued, "that working families were able to take advantage of the increased productivity that new technologies provide so that they can enjoy more leisure time, family time, educational and cultural opportunities—and less stress."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I mean they have to raise the retirement age and had (are having?) Protests about it the whole year didn't they

[-] lady_maria@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Have to"? That's obviously more than up for debate, especially considering how many people protested.

God forbid they consider increasing taxes for the rich instead.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It's 64, that's lower than the US has ever been

[-] ccunix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's just because they are whining

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1917 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

9969 readers
12 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS