this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
55 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] artemisia@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Ignoring the fact that some of these people were billionaires, I think all of them forfeited any respect for their lives when they chose to step into a metal tube and put several miles of water between them and the breathable atmosphere, for fun. Same as mountaineers choosing to climb into a "death zone". If you choose to go there for fun then that's how much YOU value your own life and your relationships. I don't see why I should then have a huge amount of sympathy when these people inevitably die.

I cannot understand why the military was mobilised at huge cost? Surely these people should sign a much more wide ranging waiver saying they are doing this at their own risk and should not expect any rescue attempts beyond what the organisers insurance policy covers?

[–] root@lemmy.belclayfer.net 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This viewpoint is misguided and inhumane, I'm sorry to say. We don't get to pick and choose who's lives have value, even if they do something risky or stupid.

I don’t see why I should then have a huge amount of sympathy when these people inevitably die.

Ugh

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

We have to choose where to spend the limited material and human resources we have.

These people made their own bed. Those rescue resources were wasted on them. Don't kid yourself that poor people in a boat accident would've got a 10th of that attention.

[–] rs5th@lemmy.scottlabs.io 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The US military spends 2 trillion a year. I'd much rather see those resources go into rescue operations than the opposite. Poor people in a boat should absolutely get access to the same resources, and the crime here is not that billionaires did, but that the migrants didn't.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

These weren't people on the job, or people doing anything remotely necessary. This was a joy trip for spoiled richies, and I don't see any justification for spending societal effort on it.

Not to mention rescue was most likely doomed from the start considering how far beyond the depth of any successful rescue, ever, that this was.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)