Technology

59223 readers

3444 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

307

Why This Award-Winning Piece of AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted (www.wired.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Why This Award-Winning Piece of AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted::Matthew Allen’s AI art won first prize at the Colorado State Fair. But the US government has ruled it can’t be copyrighted because it’s too much “machine” and not enough “human.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sapient_cogbag@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely based af :)

[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do artists pay for their food and rent then?

[–] sapient_cogbag@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on how radical we're talking.

On the less radical side - UBI, donations, contracts for creation of art that people want even if it's not copyrighted afterward, Convenience Factor (often used by FOSS projects), and also the fact that a lot of art is created and intended for free redistribution anyhow ^.^

On the more radical side: re-examining our entire concept of work and labour and rent, decentralused gift economies, automation, the destruction of capitalist structures as a whole, etc.